How Has the Proliferation of Privately Funded Prisons Changed the Research Paper

How Has the Proliferation of common soldierly Funded Prisons Changed the Criminal Justice System in America - Research Paper ExampleThe proliferation of privately funded prisons in America began in the 1980s when privately owned companies such as the CCA (Corrections Corporation of America) and Wackenhut Corrections were listed as legitimate companies and went public in the stock market (Shichor, 1995). The privatization of prisons, which began nearly three decades ago, due to the burgeoning population of inmates in the publicly funded prisons, and its direct impact on the budget and rising costs, is a phenomenon which can be silk hat described as the takeover of the publicly funded prisons by a group of private operators and signifies the emergence of a whole new era, that has significantly impacted the criminal justice system in the country. The contemporary private prisons business which took off after a privately funded for-profit comp each, the Corrections Corporation of Amer ica, offered to lease a government facility, leading to a historical contract, that any government had ever entered into with a private operator. The aggressive policies towards hold drug abuse, and the resultant strengthening of the laws, further gave an impetus to the private correctional facilities as much and more inmates were seen being transferred by the federal government to such private prisons. According to Cheung (2002) the federal involvement in privatization of prisons, due to the major overcrowding of the federal prisons is one of the fundamental reasons for the proliferation of private prisons in the country. Figure Rise in number of inmates between the period 1980-2007 Source U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics Proponents of the privatization of prisons have argued that increased in privatization of prisons, help in cost savings thus garnering continued public as well as political support. Such a claim is backed by research conducted over the y ears to clear the hypothesis. It was discover that the private companies have significantly contributed in cost-savings by reducing cost-per-inmate and offering affordable work as compared to the public prisons (Steiner & Wooldredge 2009). However, this claim was further rejected by another study, which stated that there is barely any difference with regard to cost-savings, since privatization has only contributed to approximately 1% savings (James & Garry, 2001). The underlying purpose of privatization of any government undertaking is to ensure better theatrical role and effective service provision in the sphere of influence and afford cost-savings without compromising on the quality of the service delivered. Privately funded prisons have claimed that they offer better quality work as compared to public prisons, a claim which was substantiated with empirical evidence by researchers. In hostel to receive accreditation, prisons are required to fulfill various criteria, such a s providing improved quality of services such as food, education, health etc., to the inmates effective implementation of rehabilitative programs and reducing the aggressive episodes between the staff and inmates, along with various other factors such as providing a safe and healthy living milieu for both the staff as well as inmates (Logan, 1991 Lanza-Kaduce & Parker, 1998 Thomas, 1997 Archambeault, 1996). In recent study conducted by Segal (2005) it was observed that merely ten percent of the public prisons were able to fulfill the criteria to receive accred